The problem
Why research teams come to us.
70%
Of a patient's relevant history lives outside the enrolling site's EHR.
6 weeks
Typical time to collect outside records for a single trial participant.
Lost to follow-up
The largest single source of missing data in long-term real-world studies.
How Retrievant helps
What changes.
Consent built for researchScoped, time-boxed, revocable authorisation with IRB-friendly language. Patients see exactly what the study receives.
Whole-history pre-screeningCheck inclusion and exclusion criteria against the full record, not just what the site has, before a screening visit is scheduled.
Follow-up without site visitsRe-run a retrieval at 6, 12 and 24 months to capture outcomes wherever the participant was treated.
De-identification on deliveryOptional pipeline strips identifiers and delivers a research-ready FHIR bundle with a linkage key held by the site.
Outcomes
What customers measure.
5 daysmedian to complete outside-records collection
2.8×more eligible candidates identified
100%of fields with provenance for audit
“Screen failures dropped because we finally saw the exclusion diagnosis before the visit, not after.”
Director of Clinical Operations · oncology CRO
Other use cases
Also built for.
Injury & disability law
Complete chronologies, without paralegals on hold.
Read →Life & health underwriting
The APS, replaced by a structured history in under an hour.
Read →Care delivery
A new patient's whole story, before the first visit.
Read →Digital health
Give users their real medical context, not just step counts.
Read →Cross-border care
Patients who move between the EU and US carry their history with them.
Read →See Retrievant on a real research case.
Bring a real case with a messy history. We'll run the agents live on a 30-minute call.
Book a demo